looking at Filtering Software

This article looks at filtering software from a particular outlook. I want to know how well different approaches work in correctly identifying spam as spam and desirable messages as genuine. For purposes of answering this question, I am not particularly interested in the details of configuring filter applications to work with various Mail Transfer Agents (MTAs). There is certainly a great deal of arcana surrounding the best configuration of MTAs such as Sendmail, QMail, Procmail, Fetchmail, and others. Further, many e-mail clients have their own filtering options and plug-in APIs. auspiciously, most of the filters I look at come with pretty good documentation covering how to configure them with various MTAs.


For purposes of my testing, I developed two collections of messages: spam and legitimate. Both collections were taken from mail I actually received in the last couple of months, but I added a important subset of messages up to several years old to broaden the test. I cannot know exactly what will be contained in next month's e-mails, but the past provides the best clue to what the future holds. That sounds hidden, but all I mean is that I do not want to limit the patterns to a few words, phrases, regular expressions, etc. that might characterize the very latest e-mails but fail to generalize to the two types.


In addition to the collections of e-mail, I developed training message sets for those tools that "learn" about spam and non-spam messages. The training sets are both larger and in part disjoint from the testing collections. The testing collections consist of slightly fewer than 2000 spam messages, and about the same number of good messages. The training sets are about twice as large.

A general comment on testing is worth highlighting. False negatives in spam filters just mean that some unnecessary messages make it to your inbox. Not a good thing, but not horrible in itself. False positives are cases where legitimate messages are misidentified as spam. This can potentially be very bad, as some legitimate messages are important, even urgent, in nature, and even those that are merely informal are ones we do not want to lose. Most filtering software allows you to save rejected messages in temporary folders pending review -- but if you need to review a folder full of spam, the usefulness of the software is thereby reduced.

1 Response to "looking at Filtering Software"

  1. The Nigerian Advance Fee Scam says:
    March 2, 2010 at 8:22 AM

    Hi, It nice to read . keep it on

Post a Comment